Belgians as SAR dogs in Europe

information obtained on my journey to the IRO conference in the Canary Islands, Spring 2001

by Kim Gilmore

During the spring of 2001, I had the distinct pleasure of representing North America at an International SAR Dog symposium. This conference was hosted by the International Rescue Dog Organization and was held in the Canary Islands. During this time I not only gleaned lots of information regarding SAR dogs in the rest of the world, but was able to get some insight as to the general feelings of using Belgians in the world of SAR.

 

Below is what I posted to the Belg-L in May of 2001…

 

I met with members of  the Swedish Rescue Dog Organisation  who were surprised that Belgians were as used as they are in the US for SAR work (my quote to them is that I know of approximately 40-50 of all varieties being worked in N. America. Unknown how far along these dogs are in training or to what levels they are being certified in their respective units). Comments made to me from members of the group was that they were seeing a real decrease in the temperament of Belgians as a whole which made them inappropriate dogs for use in SAR. I spent most of the day last Tuesday with the President of the SRDO (and Board member of the International Rescue Dog Organisation) and really questioned him on the ins and out's of what they are observing when testing Belgians for SAR suitability.

First and foremost, they are seeing a decrease in the stress threshold in the long-hairs (Tervs and Groens). Disaster work as well as other venues of SAR work require a dog not only to have stable and sociable temperaments, but a high stress threshold...this means working in horridly adverse conditions for hours at a time. Dogs cannot have noise sensitivities, visual sensitivities or olfactory/tactile sensitivities in the world of SAR. Certain behaviors can be trained, conditions de-sensitized, but in a real working environment the dogs true self will come crashing forth. What the Swedes are seeing in the dogs that come to test for SAR is that they have low thresholds and when faced with even minimal pressure, tuck tail and shut down.

What they are seeing in the Malinois (and surprisingly the German Shepherd) is low bite inhibition. Dogs are getting themselves so worked up that they are looking for an outlet and will attack anything that is within reach at the time. As dogs will be searching for people in both disaster situations as well as wilderness situations, a bite is not only a liability for the handler, but also the team. These are dogs that HAVE NOT been previously worked/tested for protection. This is a natural reaction that they are seeing.

The Swedes were the first to admit that they have two definite "breeds" for every breed in Sweden; working and show. There is very little attempt to introduce one line into the other to increase looks or temperament of the adjoining. What they are seeing in the Belgians is either extreme (in terms of sharpness and quickness of the bite for protection in the Malinois) working or all show. This has led to an interesting array of breeds currently being used in SAR in Sweden. Those being: #1) Flatcoated Retrievers, #2) Labrador Retrievers and #3) Border Collies.

I had a great, if not equally confusing for both of us in terms of translation, chat with a handler from Switzerland who is currently working a Laekenois dog and has a Malinois bitch who is started in SAR training. She loves and will continue to work Belgians and hopes to acquire a Laeken pup from one of her boys future breedings to be her next SAR dog. Her beliefs and comments were very similar to my own in terms of working Belgians in SAR....you **MUST** give them time to mature before starting them in their training. Her thoughts were, at least in Switzerland, that they were testing Belgian SAR candidates too young and as a result they were failing because they were too mentally immature to handle the pressure being put upon them. She, like me, doesn't believe in staring her Belgian SAR candidates on real training until they are AT LEAST 18-24 months of age. They you can assess their real persona, drives and natural instinct.

Switzerland is also a country that has few and far between Belgians in SAR. Denise reported that most of the working Belgians were Malinois because of the "stability issues". From what I could gather, she has the only SAR Laeken in Switzerland. There is another working Laeken bitch in Switzerland that will be bred to her boy this year and a working Laeken bitch from Germany will be bred to him late fall (from what I gather, dogs registered in Switzerland are only allowed to breed so many times...whether that is in a lifetime or per year I'm not sure, but those are the only two "approved" breedings that he is entitled to in 2001...she hopes to gain approval to breed her Malinois bitch to him in 2002).

The Norwegian contingent was more hopeful. They reported about a dozen "wonderful" working long-hairs and about as many short-hairs...I was pleased with that number until I found out that the membership roster in Norway is over 1500 certified SAR dogs! This in a country almost the size of Montana!!! They also reported a significant difference between "working and show" lines in all breeds. One of the handlers at the conference is a member of the Norwegian Navy and is a dog handler. They still prefer the GSD's (called Alsatian Shepherds throughout most of Europe), but are finding an increase in both temperament problems as well as conformation problems. They are hesitant about going with the Belgian's in the military...he was unable to tell me why. In Norway they have both a temperament test (which incorporates loud, sharp noises) as well as a suitability test. Handlers get an outline of what their dog will be tested on 6 weeks before the test so that you can train for certain things. They too are seeing most of the failures in the sound portion of the test (gun-shots, generators, etc.).

The Spanish team that was represented at the Symposium does indeed have several Malinois...very small representatives of the breed. Males were about 45-50 pounds and they stated that they had to import from a variety of working kennels throughout Europe (didn't state where). They are having a major difficulty with their Belgians in terms of dog-aggression...again, the low bite inhibition issue. Was hard to talk to these guys as much as I wanted to twist their ears as their comprehension of English was almost nil. The handlers of the Tervuren and Groenendael were not present at the symposium unfortunately and I got what info I could through a translator. The main dog being used in Spain for disaster and wilderness work is a smallish native breed (sorry, didn't catch the name) that looks similar to white Puli. The only certified dog in the Canary Island chain, believe it or not, is a Samoyed.

Also had a chance to chat with members of a Russian team (you're going to love this one...4 of their 7 cross trained SAR dogs are English Cockers and one is an Irish Setter...guess working English Cockers are really catching on in the entirety of Europe for SAR due to size, favorable temperament and drive...wonder what happened in the US?). The Russian team really wasn't sure what I was talking about when I asked about Belgians...don't think that there are many there.

There was also a team from Korea present. They have taken to breeding their own SAR/Police dogs (GSD's) as they can breed what they need/want in terms of temperament.

Ireland, England and two Icelandic teams were also present and although all were familiar with the Belgians, stated to their knowledge none being used in SAR in their countries. Preferred breeds there again were Labradors and Border Collies due to personality, work ethic and favorable drives.

Really wish members of the French and German teams would have attended as I would have loved to have gotten their impressions.

So, my thoughts with possible answers that have been running around in my sun-tanned brain in regards to what I have just typed;

1) N. Americans are breeding more temperamentally stable Belgians by either using "domestic" stock or being very selective when introducing "imports"

A: Don't think this is true. Where I think I see the biggest difference is the fact that in N. America (compromising Canada and the US), we have **YET** to see the significant difference between WORKING and SHOW in terms of the Terv and Groen. Mals seem to have a much more stable temperament that what I am gathering they do in this small representation of other countries. Breeders here are attempting to preserve the work ethic in their conformation dogs and vice versa.

2) In N. America, SAR is not as closely regulated as it is in most other European countries. Standards for performance and certifications for mission ready status are as many as there are teams throughout the continent. Therefore, we as SAR personnel in the US/Canada are more tolerant of un-becoming behaviors that might/would otherwise deem a Belgian unsuitable for SAR work in these foreign countries.

A: Unfortunately, I firmly believe this.

3) Belgians in these other countries might prove to be more favorable for SAR if not tested until late adolescence due to immaturity issues.

A: Think that this is also true. Dogs in most of these other countries are tested before one year of age. An age when most Belgians are rather squirrelly and seem to be going through yet another fear period (or hormonal issues...who the heck knows). I was very pleased that unlike the US (who I think really is into instant gratification), most of these countries don't begin to certify their SAR dog potentials until they are AT LEAST 3-4 years of age. In the US, the general consensus is that if your dog is mission ready by two, you are wasting your time. This in itself is detrimental to our Belgians who finally seem to start developing gray matter by the age of 24 months and the will/need/desire to work and learn. Denise (the handler from Switzerland) was in full agreement of this stating that she doesn't even start her Belgians until 24-36 months of age in real training and if sound, can and will work them at long as 10-12 years as they are willing and able even at advanced ages (unlike GSD's and Goldens who are ready to retire at 6-7 years of age).
 


Back to Articles & Musings